Article ID: 179583
Article Last Modified on 8/25/2006
APPLIES TO
- Microsoft Excel 97 Standard Edition
- Microsoft Excel 98 for Macintosh
This article was previously published under Q179583
SYMPTOMS
If you use the EDATE function to return a date that is a
specific number of months before or after another date, the function may return
an incorrect result.
For example, the EDATE function may incorrectly
return 3/1/2100 (March 1, 2100) instead of 2/28/2100 (February 28, 2100).
CAUSE
This problem occurs when the following conditions are true:
- The date that is returned by the function should be
February 28th.
-and-
- The start date that is used by the function falls on the
29th, 30th, or 31st of the month (for example, July 30).
-and-
- The date that is returned by the function is in a century
year that is not evenly divisible by 400, for example:
2100, 2200, 2300, 2500, 2600, 2700, 2900, 3000
NOTE: This problem does not occur if the date is in 1900 or
2000.
WORKAROUND
To work around this problem, manually modify the formulas
that use the EDATE function so that they return the correct result.
Example
Assume that you are using the following date and formula:
A1: 1/31/2100
A2: =EDATE(A1,1)
The formula in cell A2 returns 3/1/2100; however, the date you expect
to receive is 2/28/2100. You can correct the formula by adding "-1" (without
the quotation marks) to the end of the formula, as in the following example:
A1: 1/31/2100
A2: =EDATE(A1,1)-1
The formula returns 2/28/2100, which is the correct result.
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in the
Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article. This problem no
longer occurs in Microsoft Excel 2000.
MORE INFORMATION
The EDATE function, which is included in the Analysis
ToolPak, allows you to return a date that is a specific number of months before
or after another date. For example, if you want to know the date six months
from today, you can use the following formula:
=EDATE(TODAY(),6)
If today is 1/13/98, the function returns 7/13/98, the day that is six
months after today.
The problem described in this article occurs
only when the EDATE function returns a date in February of a century year that
is not a leap year, for example:
A1: 1/27/2100 B1: =EDATE(A1,1)
A2: 1/28/2100 B2: =EDATE(A2,1)
A3: 1/29/2100 B3: =EDATE(A3,1)
A4: 1/30/2100 B4: =EDATE(A4,1)
A5: 1/31/2100 B5: =EDATE(A5,1)
The formulas in cells B1 and B2 return the correct results (dates
2/27/2100 and 2/28/2100), because the start date does not fall on the 29th,
30th, or 31st of the month.
The formulas in cells B3, B4, and B5
return the incorrect result, 3/1/2100, instead of the correct result,
2/28/2100. The problem occurs because the start dates fall on the 29th, 30th,
and 31st of the month.
When you enter or fill dates in a worksheet
in Microsoft Excel 97, a date that should appear as January 1 may instead
appear as February 1. For more information on about this issue, please see the
following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
175362 XL97: January 1 May Appear as February 1 in a Date
Additional query words: XL97 y2k year2000 XL
Keywords: kbbug kbpending KB179583